DECEPTION, TRICKERY & FRAUD ON THE COURT(S) 2. As an Officer of a (various) Courts, Defendant hurtful Lee County Assistant Attorney Peterson falsely as well as fraudulently pretended, e.g., to a U.S. Court of Appeals:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Nature of a Suit
Appellant Busse claims to own as well as open annals endorse his tenure of a 50 x 130 lot adjacent a platted 60 travel upon a barrier island in Lee County named Cayo Costa. Busse claims riparian rights. The State, a County as well as a Property Appraiser repudiate his explain of riparian rights.
See Answer Brief of Defendants-Appellees Lee County, Florida, as well as Board of Lee County Commissioners, in a U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, Case # 08-13170-B, antiquated 08/14/2008.
Here, Defendant Peterson perpetrated foreign rascal as well as rascal upon a Court(s). Peterson conceded that Plaintiff(s) explain riparian rights, that were conclusively proven by a newly discovered justification as well as undoubted as well as un-rebutted 1912 Plat justification upon record, PB 3, PG twenty-five (1912). Here, Peterson asserted that [t]he State, a County as well as a Property Appraiser treated a Plaintiff decent jot down owners disparately as well as wrongfully denied Plaintiffs vested riparian property rights as well as jot down decent in isolation travel lands as well as easement(s) ownership.
3. On 08/14/2008, Defendant Jack N. Peterson materially misrepresented:
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Public annals endorse that Busse owns a lot in a platted resolution located in Lee County. This lot (50 X 130) abuts a platted 60 foot far-reaching street. At some point westward of a travel is a Gulf of Mexico. Since a resolution was platted in 1912, considerable accretion has occurred upon land adjacent a Gulf of Mexico westward of Busses lot. Appellant claims riparian rights. Lee County has claimed pronounced accreted lands for open play ground purposes. Id., p. 4.
4. Here, Defendant Jack N. Peterson fraudulently concealed that
a. The land adjacent a Gulf of Mexico is Plaintiffs platted adjoining riparian Gulf-front paper travel land, to that a Plaintiffs reason unimpeachable, free as well as clear jot down title;
b. Plaintiffs platted adjoining riparian paper travel lands aside as well as touch a navigable waters of a Gulf of Mexico, PB 3, PG 25;
c. Concededly, considerable accretion has occurred onto Plaintiffs adjoining riparian paper travel upon a Gulf of Mexico, to that a Plaintiffs reason unimpeachable, unencumbered, as well as automatically quieted jot down pretension pursuant to Floridas self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act;
d. Plaintiffs platted riparian lot, i.e. Lee County Gulf-front Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, has a surveyed depth of some-more than 2,300 feet, as well as an area of some-more than 2.6 Acres pursuant to pronounced Plat as well as a 2008 Surveys upon a record;
e. Lee County never claimed and/or asserted any claim;
f. No Lee County explain could have possibly combined and/or transferred any seductiveness or estate in Plaintiffs riparian Gulf-front travel land to Lee County, FL;
g. The Plaintiffs reason exclusive decent as well as unencumbered jot down pretension to pronounced platted adjoining riparian Gulf-front street, that runs with Plaintiffs riparian upland.
5. Here corruptly, Peterson perverted a open jot down as well as pronounced 1912 Plat for a unlawful purpose of deliberately depriving as well as defrauding a Plaintiff jot down travel owners. Here, Peterson deliberately misconstrued as well as materially misrepresented Plaintiffs decent jot down conveyance of riparian Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A upon a Gulf of Mexico. Defendant Peterson cheated a Court(s), e.g., about Plaintiffs true decent as well as unencumbered
a. Record tenure of; and
b. Record marketable as well as peerless pretension to
riparian Gulf-front Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, that abuts and/or touches a Gulf of Mexico, PB 3, PG twenty-five (1912)...